Non-Competes / Trade Secrets Archives - Page 2 of 12

Seventh Circuit Confirms Extraterritorial Reach of the Defend Trade Secrets Act

Under Motorola v. Hytera, a trade secret plaintiff can recover damages in the United States even on infringing sales that occurred outside the United States. The Seventh Circuit in Motorola confirmed that the Defend Trade Secrets Act can reach all of a defendant’s worldwide sales caused by the misappropriation, so long as — in the words of 18 U.S.C. § 1837(2) — “an act in furtherance” of the misappropriation was committed in the United States. As a result of the expansive reach of the Defend Trade Secrets Act, even in cases where the trade secret theft occurs mostly outside the United States, trade secret owners should consider whether they are still able to recover damages for foreign infringing sales in a U.S. court under the statute.

To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.

Another Minnesota Noncompete Ban: Restrictive Covenants in Service Contracts

Minnesota continues to expand its restrictions on noncompete agreements and similar restrictive covenants. Last year, the legislature banned noncompete agreements between an employer and an employee. Now, a new law that went into effect July 1, 2024, prohibits agreements between service-provider companies and their customers that would prevent customers from hiring employees of those service providers.

To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.

FTC Issues Final Rule Banning Employment Noncompete Agreements

On April 23, 2024, in a 3-2 vote along party lines, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission issued a final rule that will ban essentially all employment noncompete agreements nationwide. This alert dives into the key takeaways and what to expect next.

To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.

Under New York Law, Trade Secret Damages Must Reflect Plaintiff’s Actual Loss, Not Just Defendant’s Wrongful Gain

A recent trade secret case from New York highlights the importance of how damages are calculated and emphasizes the need to conform those damages calculations to the applicable standards in your jurisdiction.

To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.

The FTC Non-Compete Rule – It’s Finally Here (Almost)!

Yesterday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that, next Tuesday, April 23, it will be releasing the final version of its proposed rule largely prohibiting employee non-competition restrictions. See FTC Announces Special Open Commission Meeting on Rule to Ban Noncompetes | Federal Trade Commission. The announcement will be preceded by a vote by the five FTC commissioners on whether to “authorize public disclosure of the proposed final rule.” Assuming that disclosure is authorized, which is expected, the FTC will present the rule and then vote to issue it. As of yet, there has been no indication whether the final rule will be the same as the proposed rule or, if not, what the changes will be.

Continue reading “The FTC Non-Compete Rule – It’s Finally Here (Almost)!”

Are You Ready? Notice to Employees of Void CA Non-Competes Required by February 14, 2024

California law has for many years treated agreements that restrain one from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business as void and unenforceable, unless an exception applies. This applies to most non-compete and non-solicitation agreements with California employees.

Citing to California Supreme Court precedent that voided a post-employment non-compete and to state public policy favoring employee mobility, AB 1076 and SB 699, both effective January 1, 2024, prohibit employers from including, entering into, and attempting to enforce a noncompete clause in an employment contract, or otherwise requiring an employee to enter a noncompete agreement, absent an exception.

Continue reading “Are You Ready? Notice to Employees of Void CA Non-Competes Required by February 14, 2024”