On August 20, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a memorandum opinion and order holding that the Federal Trade Commission rule banning post-employment noncompetes is “unlawful” and therefore must be “set aside.” This alert covers what employers need to know.
For the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.
On August 15, another federal court weighed in on the question of whether the FTC exceeded its authority in issuing its rule banning post-employment noncompetes, scheduled to go into effect on September 4, 2024. In Properties of the Villages, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Judge Timothy Corrigan (appointed by Pres. George W. Bush) of the Middle District of Florida enjoined the FTC from implementing or enforcing its noncompete ban against the plaintiff. Judge Corrigan declined to issue a more general, nationwide injunction.
For the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.
In what some view to be a surprise development, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a decision in ATS Tree Services v. FTC on July 23 affirming enforceability of the FTC’s Noncompete Rule, which designates most noncompete clauses as unenforceable after September 4, 2024. All eyes now turn to the Northern District of Texas, where the Ryan v. FTC court has promised a final decision on or before August 30. Most expect that the Ryan court’s final decision will continue to hold that the FTC did not have authority to issue the Final Rule, creating a split of authority.
To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.
2023 proved to be a very busy year for those monitoring developments in the area of noncompetition law. We highlight 10 major state and federal developments from 2023 in the area of employee noncompetition law, including increased state and federal efforts to outright ban their use.
To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.
Gov. Tim Walz has signed or is expected to sign the Minnesota legislature’s Jobs and Economic Development and Labor Omnibus Budget Bill, bringing broad change to the Minnesota employment law landscape. Notably, the new law bans post-employment noncompete agreements in Minnesota, creates state-wide paid sick and safe time leave, prohibits restrictive franchise agreements, modifies wage disclosure protection law, provides additional protections for pregnant and nursing workers, prevents mandatory employer-sponsored meetings, and creates additional paystub requirements for construction workers, among other things. Gov. Walz signed the paid family and medical leave law, creating a new paid family and medical leave program funded by employer and employee payroll taxes and providing up to 12 weeks of paid leave in a single benefit year for an employee’s own serious health condition and up to 12 weeks of paid leave in a single benefit year for bonding, safety leave or family care, with a cap of no more than 20 weeks of total combined leave in any single benefit year. The Minnesota legislature also ended its 2023 session after passing a recreational cannabis law, amending the state’s drug and alcohol testing laws following the legalization of recreational marijuana, which is anticipated to be signed into law by Gov. Walz this week.
On May 11, 2023, the Minnesota Legislature agreed to a new law rendering void and unenforceable all future covenants not to compete, with limited exceptions for agreements entered into in connection with the sale or dissolution of a business. Following a final vote in the House and Senate, the law will be sent by Gov. Tim Walz for his signature. The law is written to take effect July 1, 2023, and to apply to contracts and agreements entered into on or after that date. With enactment, Minnesota will become the fourth state to impose a complete ban on employment-related noncompetes (joining California, Oklahoma and North Dakota).
The law prohibits any noncompete agreement with an employee or independent contractor that restricts the person from working for another business after termination of employment or independent contractor engagement regardless of a person’s income, with only two very limited carveouts for noncompetes agreed upon (1) during the sale of a business where the agreement prohibits the seller from carrying on a similar business within a reasonable geographical area for a reasonable period of time, or (2) in anticipation of the dissolution of a business where the dissolving partnership or entity agrees that all or any number of the partners, members, or shareholders will not carry on a similar business in a reasonable geographical area for a reasonable period of time. Subject to those limited exceptions, the law provides that any “covenant not to compete” contained in a contract is void and unenforceable. Importantly, a “covenant not to compete” does not include nondisclosure, confidentiality, trade secret, or non-solicitation agreements (including specifically those restricting the ability to use client or contact lists or restricting the solicitation of customers). Also, because “covenant not to compete” is defined in terms of prohibiting conduct “after termination of the employment,” the new law will not prohibit agreements that restrict an employee or independent contractor from working for another business while performing services for a business.
Continue reading “Minnesota Legislature Agrees to Complete Ban on Noncompetes”