On August 20, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a memorandum opinion and order holding that the Federal Trade Commission rule banning post-employment noncompetes is “unlawful” and therefore must be “set aside.” This alert covers what employers need to know.
For the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.
On August 15, another federal court weighed in on the question of whether the FTC exceeded its authority in issuing its rule banning post-employment noncompetes, scheduled to go into effect on September 4, 2024. In Properties of the Villages, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Judge Timothy Corrigan (appointed by Pres. George W. Bush) of the Middle District of Florida enjoined the FTC from implementing or enforcing its noncompete ban against the plaintiff. Judge Corrigan declined to issue a more general, nationwide injunction.
For the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.
While the FTC’s noncompete ban is still scheduled to go into effect on September 4, 2024, there are three ongoing legal challenges to it; and there are pending motions in all three cases that could enjoin it either nationwide or on some limited basis before then. In the meantime, employers may wonder what to do. We outline several options.
To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.
On July 17, 2024, Gov. Josh Shapiro signed the Fair Contracting for Health Care Practitioners Act into Pennsylvania law. The Act prohibits the enforcement of certain noncompete covenants entered into after January 1, 2025, by health care practitioners and their employers, subject to limited, but important, exceptions. Therefore, Pennsylvania health care employers should review their employment agreements and revise them to ensure compliance.
To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.
In Motorola, the Seventh Circuit provided useful direction on navigating complex remedies issues in trade secret cases. In light of this decision, the plaintiff in trade secret cases should consider preserving conflicting damages models through trial to allow for the recovery of the largest award. Likewise, a trade secret plaintiff should consider utilizing the burden-shifting approach to recover unjust enrichment sales. The trade secret plaintiff can also rely — at least in circumstances like those in Motorola — on unjust enrichment damages to calculate exemplary damages. In addition, the court can consider a defendant’s litigation conduct in deciding the scope of the injunctive relief ordered.
To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.
In what some view to be a surprise development, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a decision in ATS Tree Services v. FTC on July 23 affirming enforceability of the FTC’s Noncompete Rule, which designates most noncompete clauses as unenforceable after September 4, 2024. All eyes now turn to the Northern District of Texas, where the Ryan v. FTC court has promised a final decision on or before August 30. Most expect that the Ryan court’s final decision will continue to hold that the FTC did not have authority to issue the Final Rule, creating a split of authority.
To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.