Part 29 of “The Restricting Covenant Series”: From Reliable to Unpredictable: Navigating Post-Employment Restrictive Covenants in Delaware

Once considered a reliable “go-to” state for enforcing noncompetes and nonsolicitation agreements, Delaware is now a minefield of unpredictability. Historically, if a noncompete’s geographic, temporal or business activity scope was too broad, Delaware courts used the “blue-pencil” doctrine1 to render them reasonable and enforceable. Those days are largely gone. Blue-penciling is not a reliable safety net for employers in the First State. Today, Delaware courts are more likely to strike overly broad restrictions than to rewrite them, exposing employers to competitive risks if their agreements are not precisely tailored or carefully crafted.

Something is Afoot in the First State

Delaware’s reputation as the jurisdiction of choice for business is rooted in its robust and employer-friendly corporate laws. It is a “contractarian state,” meaning its courts respect and enforce the bargains struck by parties – whether in employment, merger, stock or partnership agreements – so long as those bargains are not unconscionable or contrary to public policy. This contractarian philosophy has long offered businesses predictability and reliability, making Delaware a preferred state of incorporation.

Continue reading “Part 29 of “The Restricting Covenant Series”: From Reliable to Unpredictable: Navigating Post-Employment Restrictive Covenants in Delaware”

Top 10 Noncompete Developments of 2024

Without a doubt, 2024 was a roller coaster of a year for employers in the area of noncompete law, from an FTC attempted nationwide ban on most noncompete agreements, to continued state law action seeking to narrow the use of noncompete provisions, to a growing number of court decisions revealing deep frustration by judges asked to enforce overbroad post-employment restrictions. Employers looking to protect confidential information and customer goodwill through the use of noncompetition or nonsolicitation provisions should stay abreast of state law developments and review existing agreements to ensure they are narrowly tailored to address judicially recognized protectable interests.

To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.

Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.: Opening the Door to Non-Compete Agreements Between Businesses in California

In a recent decision, Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.,[1] the Supreme Court of California opened the door for some restrictive covenants between commercial enterprises, but it left alone California law generally prohibiting post-employment restrictive covenants with employees.
Continue readingIxchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.: Opening the Door to Non-Compete Agreements Between Businesses in California”

©2025 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Privacy Policy