Charles Knapp, Martin Chester, Author at Laborsphere

Federal Court Decision Creates Greater Uncertainty as to Future of FTC Final Rule on Noncompete Clauses

In what some view to be a surprise development, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a decision in ATS Tree Services v. FTC on July 23 affirming enforceability of the FTC’s Noncompete Rule, which designates most noncompete clauses as unenforceable after September 4, 2024. All eyes now turn to the Northern District of Texas, where the Ryan v. FTC court has promised a final decision on or before August 30. Most expect that the Ryan court’s final decision will continue to hold that the FTC did not have authority to issue the Final Rule, creating a split of authority.

To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.

Another Minnesota Noncompete Ban: Restrictive Covenants in Service Contracts

Minnesota continues to expand its restrictions on noncompete agreements and similar restrictive covenants. Last year, the legislature banned noncompete agreements between an employer and an employee. Now, a new law that went into effect July 1, 2024, prohibits agreements between service-provider companies and their customers that would prevent customers from hiring employees of those service providers.

To view the full alert, visit the Faegre Drinker website.

9th Circuit Says Forum Selection and Choice of Law in Employment Agreement Violate California Law

On March 14, 2022, the 9th Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California’s decision in DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp., that invalidated the New Jersey forum selection clause in the employment contract of Stryker’s former sales associate as a matter of California law and denied Stryker’s motion to transfer the litigation to New Jersey. Though forum selection clauses are generally enforceable under federal law, the 9th Circuit reasoned that deference must be given to state law in determining the validity of a forum selection clause before considering whether the clause is enforceable under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

The case involved a former Stryker medical device sales associate, Jonathan Waber, who was employed by Stryker in California and who signed an employment contract with Stryker without legal representation. The agreement included non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, and also included forum-selection and choice-of-law clauses requiring adjudication of contract disputes in New Jersey. After less than one year of employment with Stryker, Waber left Stryker to work for one of its competitors, DePuy. After receiving a cease-and-desist letter from Stryker, DePuy and Waber preemptively filed a declaratory judgment action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Stryker and its subsidiary, Howmedica.

Continue reading “9th Circuit Says Forum Selection and Choice of Law in Employment Agreement Violate California Law”