On September 24, 2019 the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a revised Final Overtime Rule increasing the minimum salary threshold for overtime exemption to $35,568. The Final Overtime Rule takes effect on January 1, 2020.
The DOL’s Final Overtime Rule increases the weekly salary threshold for minimum wage and overtime exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) from $455 to $684 (an increase in the annual minimum salary from $23,600 to $35,568). The Final Overtime Rule also increases the minimum annual exemption salary threshold for highly compensated employees (HCEs) from $100,000 to $107,432.
The minimum salary thresholds for FLSA exemption under the DOL’s Final Overtime Rule differ slightly from those the DOL previously proposed in March 2019. The DOL’s Final Overtime Rule increases the minimum weekly salary threshold from a proposed $679 to $684, and decreases the minimum HCE annual exemption salary threshold from a proposed $147,414 to $107,432.
As expected, the DOL’s Final Overtime Rule allows employers to count certain nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments (including commissions) as up to 10 percent of an employee’s standard salary level, so long as the additional payments are made at least annually. Accordingly, employers can bump up an employee’s earned salary with a bonus to meet the minimum salary standard. The Final Overtime Rule also revises designated salary levels for employees in the motion picture industry and employees working in certain U.S. territories. The salary thresholds under the DOL’s 2020 Final Overtime Rule will update every four years following a notice and comment period.
Employers have the remainder of 2019 to comply with the DOL’s Final Overtime Rule.
Drinker Biddle will provide detailed information regarding the Final Overtime Rule in future blog posts. The full text of the Final Overtime Rule is available on the DOL website at www.dol.gov/whd/overtime2019/.
On July 23, 2019, the Chicago City Council passed the controversial Chicago Fair Workweek Ordinance (the Ordinance). Once Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, a vocal proponent of the Ordinance, signs it into law, the Ordinance is scheduled to take effect for the majority of covered employers on July 1, 2020.
The Chicago Ordinance covers:
Continue reading “Landmark Chicago “Fair Workweek” Ordinance Entitles Employees to Pay for Schedule Changes and Lost Work Hours”
Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an arbitration agreement cannot be read as permitting class arbitration unless the agreement clearly and explicitly so provides; it is not enough that the agreement is susceptible to the interpretation that it permits class arbitration. This holding gives employers another tool to fend off class actions and compel alleged class claims to individual arbitration.
Continue reading “Supreme Court Gives Employers Another Tool to Fend Off Class Actions”
A group of security workers for the National Football League urged Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. of the Southern District of New York to deny the NFL’s motion to arbitrate the group’s claims, arguing they never agreed to arbitrate statutory employment rights with the league. In Foran, et al. v. National Football League, et al., the group of security workers sued the NFL in November 2018 for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), among other claims, alleging the NFL misclassified them as independent contractors. The NFL moved to compel arbitration arguing the security workers’ claims are covered by the arbitration provision in their independent contractor agreements. The plaintiffs, in opposition, contend that unless the arbitration provision specifically includes a waiver of statutory claims under the FLSA, the NFL cannot compel arbitration of the claims. The motion remains pending before Judge Carter.
Continue reading “Arbitration Provisions: Applicable to Independent Contractors or Not?”
*Originally published by CalCPA in the January/February 2019 issue of California CPA — the original article can be found here.
As the #MeToo movement gained momentum to right the wrongs of sexual harassment alleged against Hollywood, business and politicians, so too has the California Legislature responded by declaring, in essence, #TimesUp.
Of the nearly 600 bills introduced in 2018 that mention “employer,” compared to 304 bills in 2017) 455 mentioned “sexual harassment,” (compared to 347 the prior year). While most of those bills did not pass, and of the ones that did, Gov. Brown did not sign several into law, many of the new laws will have significant impact on our state.
Continue reading “Work It: What California Employers Should Know About New Laws for 2019”
In 2018, Governor Brown signed several laws impacting California employers. A summary of some of the key new laws follows. The effective date of each new law is indicated in the heading of the Assembly Bill (AB) and/or Senate Bill (SB).1 The list below is in numerical order by AB or SB.
Continue reading “Summary of Key New California Laws for 2019 (and Beyond): What Employers Should Know”